

Doing business across borders comes with risk—and nowhere is that risk more visible than in emerging markets where corporate information isn’t always straightforward. Nigeria is one of Africa’s largest economies, boasting of one its most dynamic commercial hubs [through Lagos, Nigeria]. This helps Nigeria attract global trade, investment, and partnerships. But aside the euphoria of closing a new cross-border deal, how can an international entity verify who they’re really dealing with?
At Kabbiz Global, we support foreign companies, law firms, and compliance teams in uncovering the critical facts about Nigerian companies before deals are signed or funds are transferred. Whether you’re looking to vet a potential supplier, evaluate a joint venture partner, or trace the ownership of a company, this article lays out exactly how international entities can conduct legally sound, discreet, and actionable corporate investigations into Nigerian entities.
Nigeria presents opportunity for any Corporation or individual ready to head into the country to do business — but Nigeria also presents opacity in equal measure. Shell companies, inactive directors, shadow directors, deceased directors, and even vague operational claims carried on in non-existent addresses are not uncommon. For international firms, conducting an investigation into their local counterpart before entering commercial arrangements is not just good practice—it can be a regulatory requirement in your home jurisdiction.
Depending on the scope of your investigation, you may be able to uncover:
All these data, when pooled from both public and private source, surely forms the basis of reliable Intelligence gathering and reporting.
Here are some of the methods we use—or advise foreign entities to consider:
Access to Nigeria’s CAC database can reveal official registration details, company status, and history of filings. We maintain direct access as we are CAC-accredited agents and can access company records to find out necessary and relevant information.
Shareholder and directorship structures can indicate shell entities, cross-holdings, or nominee appointments.
A company might have no public warnings but be involved in multiple active lawsuits—particularly for debt, fraud, or breach of contract issues. With the necessary information, we can conduct search at relevant court registries, including the High Courts, the National Industrial Court and the Federal High Court.
All companies provide operational addresses during negotiations, et cetera. Now, it is important to ask these questions: does a company actually operate from its stated address? Are you sure the company is actually conducting business at their stated address or merely using it as a placeholder? Have they moved from their address without updating their details on public Corporate Records? Do they maintain staff, stock, or real transactions? Field checks to those addresses (where needed) offer physical confirmation of company claims.
In recent times, Nigerians prefer taking to social media and dedicated investigative sites to air their grievances about fraudulent entities. It’s a “name them and shame them” tactic employed to get quick results. As such, news stories and digital footprints of companies already online can all flag reputational red flags.
Let’s be honest—conducting corporate investigations in Nigeria isn’t always straightforward. While there’s an increasing push toward transparency and digitized records from many Nigerian regulatory agencies, with the CAC leading the push, the reality on the ground is that several systemic and structural issues make investigations complex. Here are a few challenges international entities should be aware of:
Nigeria’s Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) database has improved over the years, but not all filings are digitized or current. Although all entities currently being incorporated have their entire details and records with the CAC online on the CAC portal, the same cannot be said for older companies that have not updated their details on the portal. CAC on its own makes no push to update these entities as well. Some companies may fail to update changes in directorship, shareholding, or registered address—even years after such changes occur. This can create a misleading picture of a company’s current state unless verified with supporting sources.
It’s common for Nigerian companies to appoint nominee directors or shareholders who serve as placeholders. This makes it difficult to identify the true beneficial owner of the business—particularly in cases where the entity is being used to obscure identity, avoid liability, or skirt regulatory scrutiny. The CAC requires persons with significant control to be disclosed, but many won’t and don’t.
Some registered companies have little to no real business operations. They exist on paper but have no physical office, no employees, and no assets. These shell structures may be used to win contracts, bid for tenders, or receive international payments before disappearing. Unfortunately, many of them are operated by politically exposed persons who use them for the above-mentioned reasons.
There’s no single “all-in-one” portal in Nigeria where you can verify everything about a company. Information is siloed across different regulatory bodies: CAC, FIRS, NAFDAC, NIPC, SON, and various sector-specific commissions. Each has its own format, process, and timeline for accessing data. Thus, to conduct corporate investigations across those agencies, you have to visit them one after the other, and this process can be tiring and expensive.
While some Nigerian court systems have started publishing judgments online and even allowing parties to file cases online [Port Harcourt and Delta State have such new innovations] many court records—especially in the states—are still manually archived. This limits the ability of foreign entities to independently detect whether a company is embroiled in serious litigation or facing enforcement actions. They would have to be sure of the cases their local counterparts are involved in, then engage investigations to search the case file of those cases.
Finally, many international firms underestimate the time, tone, and tact required to gather sensitive business intelligence in Nigeria. Calling a company to “verify” their registration may alert them prematurely. Asking questions in the wrong way can lead to silence, defensiveness, or even a denial of legitimate information.
At Kabbiz Global, we help international firms see past the surface of submitted. Whether you’re a law firm, investor, compliance officer, or procurement team, we deliver corporate intelligence on Nigerian companies—fast.
From verifying CAC filings and director histories to tracing litigation, red flags, or shell structures, our reports are built for decision-makers who can’t afford guesswork. We bridge the gap between what’s publicly stated and what’s actually happening on the ground—drawing on a mix of registry access, local intelligence, and legal-commercial insight.
We’ve supported clients across India, Europe, and the Middle East—most recently helping an Indian law firm uncover critical background details before engaging a Nigerian party. That single report saved time, mitigated risk, and built lasting trust.
If you’re currently evaluating a Nigerian entity, or simply want to future-proof your decisions, our team is ready. Our professionals and lawyers at Kabbiz Global Nominees Limited are CAC-accredited agents and seasoned compliance professionals who understand all the requirements from the CAC. We can help you with your changes in your company address. For professional assistance, please send an email to us at [email protected] so we can help you manage the process.
You can also call us on +2348064231176 or click here to chat us up on WhatsApp. We ensure respond to all business enquiries within twenty-four hours, max.